Skip to content

Conversation

@Eunoia1729
Copy link
Contributor

Resolves: #432

Copy link
Contributor

@SarcasticNastik SarcasticNastik left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: You can move the method in the previous impl <Pk: MiniscriptKey> .. block.

@SarcasticNastik
Copy link
Contributor

ACK edf7587

@Eunoia1729
Copy link
Contributor Author

nit: You can move the method in the previous impl <Pk: MiniscriptKey> .. block.

I was keen into minimising line changes but your suggestion seems more better. Thanks for the review!

Copy link
Member

@apoelstra apoelstra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK edf7587

Copy link
Member

@sanket1729 sanket1729 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK edf7587

@sanket1729 sanket1729 merged commit d589fe9 into rust-bitcoin:master Jun 28, 2022
heap-coder added a commit to heap-coder/rust-miniscript that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2025
…max_satisfaction_weight

edf75875735b99ff6368c920405dff0fb32c35ce Remove ToPublicKey bound for max_satisfaction_weight (eunoia_1729)

Pull request description:

  Resolves: #432

ACKs for top commit:
  SarcasticNastik:
    ACK edf7587
  apoelstra:
    ACK edf75875735b99ff6368c920405dff0fb32c35ce
  sanket1729:
    ACK edf75875735b99ff6368c920405dff0fb32c35ce

Tree-SHA512: 57ca26abf31d5022ded5f7ca82f652605794a1c9f0d6b483158018865f4815d8298621ecd0e90af59bfebb70095a039f83b2873b0d245864b2fece480c648c65
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Descriptor::max_satisfaction_weight should not require a ToPublicKey bound

4 participants